Insane v.4 b.8 n.5, the eighth puzzle of a review of the KrazyDad Insane collection on www.krazydad.com, defies Andrew Stuart’s Sudokuwiki, and requires the trial of a pattern sliced cluster to be brought down.
The basic trace signals trouble ahead. It’s too simple for comfort.
But actually, the line marking was not that hard. See the line fill strings on the grid below.
The 2019 update uncovered a simple error that completely changed the solution path, but miraculously arrived at the same solution.
The update relied on Andrew Stuart’s Sudokuwiki to check for other errors that might undermine the demonstration of pattern analysis concluding this post.
Starting Sysudoku Advanced, the bv scan has only this lesson for Sue de Coq fans. The bv in the NWr3 intersect does guarantee that 8 or 9 is present, but it doesn’t guarantee that 1 or 2 is present. The lesson is that the (8+9) factor doesn’t guarantee that the Single Alternate expression
NWr3 = 6(8+9)(1+2)+698, that we might be led to obtain by deleting 1 and 2 from the grid intersect, is true either. It can be 689. That means that the trial of
NWr3 = 6(89+98) finds the solution.
But we would be missing a ton by going that way. Instead the 6-panel keeps us interested with this little slink chain interpreted as an AIC.
Then, in AIC building, a parade of elaborate AIC chip away at the semi-monster.
Leaving from 7r5c7 a 7-chain goes through three AIC hinges to become a 9-chain back to the starting cell 9r5c7.
Then with a modest extension, the boomerang gobbles a second candidate in the starting cell.
Using part of the AIC a third time, Sudokuwiki comes up with one of Andrew Stuart’s Sudowiki.com strategies, the digit forcing chain. Sudokuwiki plays it three times, using 7r1c3 as the starting digit.
Actually, this is an AIC ANL with an ALS value group (see the Guide) and one of its members as the chain terminals. Can you see it that way?
In an early post of 11/06/12, Stuart’s digit forcing chain is revealed to be another name for an almost nice loop, a concept soundly explained, and so named, by Andrew Stuart. The “digit forcing chain” comes from the spotting practice of picking a digit along the chain, then developing an AIC in both directions. On his Strategies page, and in Sudokuwiki messages, Andrew Stuart continues the digit fc, compounding the myth by selecting a digit as if it mattered which one along the chain you start with. Of course, selecting a digit and going both ways without knowing it’s on an ANL is just guessing, a beginner’s tactic ultimately doomed on hard puzzles.
Sudokuwiki missed a clue in the above ANL. Solve the mystery yourself, then join me in the next post, where this clue will be used to get Sudokuwiki through to a solution without pattern slicing. Sudokuwiki puts on a good show without it, starting with this naked triple and NWc3 boxline.
Next is an update example on the unique rectangle. It’s a relatively new type, named in Andrew’s Strategies as Type 2b. When a naked pair in two boxes is part of the rectangle, and one of them is slinked, then the other UR value in the extra’s corner of the opposite side must be removed, because it forces UR values into opposite corners, where they can just be swapped for another solution, without the remaining cells of the puzzle being affected.
Andrew’s Type 2 and Type 2b are described in the Guide.
Before Sudokuwiki runs aground, it produces three gems we wouldn’t want to miss. First is this grouped boomerang.
We call it grouped as if the grouping is intentional. But remember, in AIC building we start with any slink emerging from any cell, and take anything to keep it going until a slinked endpoint sees any other candidate in the starting cell. The 8 group is just a way slink away from 8r3c7.
In the next boomerang it’s an ALS node. We wink in to the 9 group of the ALS and catch the internal slink to 2, and wink out on 2, on our way to 3 or 5 or 9, whatever.
Here’s the icing on the cake. We’re set up for an ALS toxic set of three 9’s, produced by two ALS with two 5 value groups in restricted common. My pal Gordon Fick would have spotted this, but it might be beyond anybody else.
At this point Sudokuwiki announces it has run out of its creator’s strategies. Here is the grid it leaves us, with a modest blue/green cluster. It would be instructive to go into AIC building on the line marked grid, to see how many of the AIC you would come up with.
As to Sysudoku solving paths from here, there’s irregular XYZ-wings, pattern analysis and trials.
For pattern analysis, the 2-panel looks promising from an r8 freeform starting line: two pink, and two olive, and one orphan. Note that solid pink and dashed olive don’t intersect. Same for dashed pink and solid olive. That gives two pattern clusters for trials.
One advantage of choosing two of four patterns that don’t interfere is the traps on the patterns not selected. Another is more related candidates on trial. If one of the patterns is true, the traps are valid.
We use red for pink, and orange for olive, because we are using coloring properties of the paired panels.
The immediate effect of the traps here is a naked triple in r1 and a naked pair in r3.
After expansion of the red/orange cluster, orange is wrapped logically. It is shown to remove all 6 candidates from r4.
Then with red taking over, green is caught taking all 5’s from the East box. The collapse into a red. white and blue solution is immediate, if a bit late for the 4th. It’s customary here to use pencil marks in the center to represent clues in a trial.
Without guaranteed uniqueness, a trial of the dashed pink, solid olive pattern pair would be warranted, But Sudokuwiki has already run the exhaustive search to guarantee the unique solution.
Next week in the updated review, Sudokuwiki makes it through with the new ANL clue you found. Uhhhh, you did find it, didn’t you?